next up previous
Next: Conclusions Up: Bit Pattern Analysis Previous: Formulation

Bit Pattern Results

Typical bit patterns are illustrated in Fig. 7

  
Figure 7: Bit pattern for 8 GeV/c particles using the pad layout described in the PHENIX CDR (Case 1 in Fig. 2).

The pattern for muons is very simple. Since essentially all the muons produce one hit per plane for all six planes the pattern for muons is very simple. For the case of one hit per plane the pattern value is

There appears to be one road for which there are two hits in the first plane, giving Patt = 111112. For the pion tracks, on the other hand, only 38 out of the total of 3421 roads produce . Therefore, excellent discrimination is obtained by simply identifying roads for which as muons. Figure 8 shows the same patterns but only shows events for which .

  
Figure 8: Same as the preceding figure but for

The effects of changing the detector efficiency to 0.95 is shown in Fig. 9. The ``missed hits'' in intermediate planes results in more than 150 out of the original 2002 muon roads producing . In other words, the main result from a decrease in detection efficiency is to make muon roads look more like pion roads.

  
Figure 9: Same as Fig. 7 but for detector efficiency = 0.95

Finally we show in Fig. 10 the bit pattern obtained for the 1.5 GeV/c data. The figure shows that none of the muon roads penetrates beyond plane 5. Moreover, about 300 of the 1997 muon tracks only reach to the fourth plane. Figure 11 shows the same data for . This shows that, if roads having are identified as pion roads then only 25 out of the original 2032 pion roads would be mis-identified and 1997 - 1650 = 347 muon roads would be mis-identified.

  
Figure 10: Bit patterns for 1.5 GeV/c data

  
Figure 11: Bit patterns for 1.5 GeV/c data with

In Fig. 12 we summarize the results of the Discriminant Analysis and the Bit Pattern Analysis. The fractions shown in each case were determined by choosing a bias that would give approximately equal muon ``acceptance'' and pion ``rejection'' for each case.

  
Figure 12: Comparison of Discriminant Analysis and Bit Pattern Analysis

For the most part the two methods give essentially the same results. The exception to this is the 1.5 GeV/c data for which the Discriminant Analysis is clearly superior. At the higher momenta, however, Discriminant Analysis is no better than the simpler Bit Pattern Analysis and may be slightly worse.



next up previous
Next: Conclusions Up: Bit Pattern Analysis Previous: Formulation



Converted to HTML from LaTeX by Christine Jarmer
Thu Nov 9 08:58:12 MST 1995