After the Geant 'nan bug' was fixed, resolutions turned up
worse than before. Likely the screwup of the materials definition in SVX
(aircold, carbon-carbon, ...) made these materials effectively zero-mass,
leading to
overly optimistic resolutions. Most of the mass seen by endcap-traversing
particles is in the carbon of the support panels:
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The current endcap layers consist of a 3mm carbon support
panel (so that 3mm cooling tubes could be embedded). On either side are mounted
narrow carbon spacer strips (same width as the readout chips, 3.8mm),
readout chips
down the spine of the silicon, and finally the silicon.
The 3mm carbon panel is the main culprit limiting the resolution of the detector. | |||||||||||||||||||||
The proposed stack has Si and chips mounted side-by-side, on top of a 200 μm Kapton/copper bus, on top of 0.5mm carbon. These units are placed on the front/back of a panel that carries the heat to the disk perimeter, and is here drawn as 2 skins of 0.5mm pyrolytic graphite, with a low-density core. Assume there are 6 100μm glue layers (si-bus, bus-carbon and carbon-carbon). If we assume Kapton/copper and glue are roughly equivalent to carbon, a typical particle sees 3mm of carbon and 300μm of Si. | |||||||||||||||||||||
While we were looking at materials, I revisited the mass in front of the endcaps.
The barrel supports had been modeled as 5×5 mm carbon rings.
They are actually half-circles, with support posts going up and down in a 8° angle.
The rings are also thicker and wider.
Pisa volume names: SISP for the rings (red), SISQ for the posts (blue) | |||||||||||||||||||||
The cooling tube manifolds are also semi-circular, with feeds going up and down. The individual tubes sitting on the ladders are 4mm OD, 0.356mm wall aluminum. The manifolds have diameters such that the total cross-sectional liquid area is preserved for each layer, and thus manifold tube diameters increase by layer.
Pisa volume names: SJSP for the rings (red), SJSQ for the vertical tubes (black) | |||||||||||||||||||||
This cross section, parallel to the beam pipe (black line on top) shows the ends of barrel layers 1,2,3, plus cross sections of the support rings and cooling mainfolds. In order to accomodate these items, I had to shorten SISR, the 'support cone' that represents barrel cables, and carbon support for the endcaps. SJCC represents the barrel-1 cables, now thinned to 0.5mm carbon (was 1.0). SICC is now 2×0.5mm carbon, representing additional cables from barrel2, 3 etc. |
(work by Melynda, Zhengyun, HvH) We had observed a deterioration of the resolution when these changes were made. In particular, changing the support plane thickness made resolution get worse (a roughly linear relation). This was finally traced to a mismatch between Pisa geometry and offline geometry. Using the new geant-to-root geometry tools, this problem was solved. The black points show the 'old' software chain, with the geometry hard-coded into the offline software. The red points are the same geometry, but using the root-geometry path. The improvement is due to a bug in the offline code where there was confusion about which silicon panels were inner/outer radius and left/right on a panel. The green points result when you then reduce the support panel thickness from 3mm to 2mm. Improvement is most marked at low momenta, as expected.
Files used:
input to pisa:
cmfgm- type input file, using the Pisa cfm_multi command.
These are 10000 muons with 1.4<eta<2.0, 1<p<11 GeV.
In these two macros, there is this new line: if( use_FVTX ) { gSystem->Load("libfvtx_subsysreco.so"); FVTXGEOM::set_root_initialized(); se->registerSubsystem( new FvtxUnpackPisa() );This causes them to pick up file fvtxgeom.root, produced as described here. ErrorsFromProfile.C is used for display. | |
text | |
text | |
text |