TCIM Changes in August 2001
1) This change was suggested by Pat McGaughey. The 74act827 which
drives the 10 MHz clock signal on the VME backplane is not spec'ed
for the amount of capacitance it sees when trying to drive 20 DCIM
boards. Therefore, we "doubled up" two input and outputs from the
chip on the TCIM (sorry I do not know its name on the schematic
right now) to improve the drive capability.
2) This change was also suggested by Pat McGaughey. This was not a change
to the TCIM, but a change in the termination of the clock lines
on the VME backplane. The changes attempted to pull the clock line to
~ 2.5 Volts. Some connectors, which fit on the backplane, were
made which did something like this:
view at back of crate
+5 +5
| |
R R
| |
-------clock-line-----------
| |
R R
| |
Ground Ground
where R = 1000 ohms. Impedance = R/4 = 250 ohms.
Actually, we did not use exactly 1000 ohms, but I forgot what we did use.
We changed the diagram a little because the power supply to the crate
is at 6.5 V, not 5.0 V and we wanted the clock line at 2.5 V.
3) This change commected previously independent grounds for the Glink
part of the circuit board and the rest of the board. The orignal
clock comes in in the Glink part of the board. The signal then goes
to the rest of the board which distributes it to the MCMs (from
the front panel) and the DCIMs (through the VME backplane). The
signal went from one part of the board to the other, but their grounds
are indenpendent on the board itself. There seems to be a substantial
(0.5 to 1.0 V) 40 MHz oscillition between these two grounds. This
is/was surely part of the problem. There is a little confusion
about the magnitude of the oscillation because the wire I
attached to the scope probes to reach beteen the two grounds
picked up this clock also. We connected the two grounds
together with a wire on the board. Probably this connection could be
made in a better place.
John Sullivan
last update: 15-Jan-2002