In order to convince ourselves that the flow will be adequate,
we will build a test channel. It will have the inlet barbs and
channel shape as the real half-disks, and will have the same length
as the station 2,3,4 half-disk perimeter. Also, it will have the same
distribution of holes alongside the channel, so we can see glue/leak
problems early, if they exist.
Click for a bigger version--> | |
For incoming fluid, there was a sudden widening with sharp
edges (fat green line and arrow. Even a sudden widening contributes
to impedance. The red lines show a modified shape, with a sphere
tangent to the barb's bottom exit rim, and a gentle (<8 degrees)
flaring out to the right.
Click for a bigger version--> | |
The channel shape has been improved. Due to space limitations (the
distance available between the barb and where the channel makes
a turn), the slope is ~9 degrees. The channel will be milled with a
1/8-inch ball bit, and flare out later by 1/32" on each side to the
3/16" channe width.
Click for a bigger version--> | |
5 May 2010: Concerns about the strength of the barb attachment →
increase the barb foot size.
on a disk Click for a bigger version--> | |
July 2010: A test channel was fabricated by Eric Anderson with the input and output
barbs shaped to minimize impedance to fluid flow. Since most of the flow
impedance is at the entry and exit points, the rest of the chanel is just
a 20 cm straight section, having the proper cross section.
The test setup consisted of a CO2 gas bottle, a pressure reducer and precision pressure gauge, followed by a 2-liter water reservoir, marked at 250cc intervals, followed by the test channel and a drain. Time (in seconds) was marked as the water level fell past these marks. The nominal operating pressure drop is 20 psi. Raw data, 2 runs per pressure setting: 10 psi 20 psi 30 psi 40 psi --------- --------- --------- --------- :18 :58 :15 :12 :08 :10 :18 :25 :04 :21 :18 :41 :17 :18 :26 :32 :10 :28 :29 :52 :25 :26 :32 :38 :16 :34 :39 :04 :33 :35 :39 :45 :22 :40 :51 :17 :40 :43 :46 :52 :29 :46 :02 :28 :49 :51 :53 :58 :35 :52 :14 :39 :56 :59 :58 :05 :41 --------- --------- --------- --------- 21.8 cc/sec 29.8 cc/sec 37.4 cc/sec 40.6 cc/secThere is a weak dependence on pressure, with flow ~= ( 15.5 + 0.63*psi ) cc/sec (plot to follow) In the 2007 Hytec design report, page 40, the flow rate is set at 14cc/sec for #M HFE7200. for a estimated pressure drop of 1.7 psi per half-disk, including barbs. This is based on a power dissipation of 100 uW/channnel. |
html>