Improve calibrations, both pedestals and "mip" peaks.
The pedestal calibrations attempt to find the mean and width (sigma) of
the pedestal. We cut ~3 sigma above the pedestals to separate signal from
noise. The problem is that we can't fit the pedestals in the runs we
use for the analysis -- we have zero suppression on for all data-taking runs.
The only pedestals we can look at in real data taking runs are the one of every
16 channels which are not zero suppressed. In order to set up zero suppression,
we do periodic standalone runs (with no beam) without zero suppression. These
set the zero suppression cuts used online. These calibration runs may give us
better pedestals than we get in any other way -- I'm not exactly sure how
Sangsu has been doing this so far. Unfortunately, our scripts which did the pedestal runs
somehow because broken. They typically did not run for as many events
as they should have. The best pedestal runs are from very late in run 3.
We do not have clear information on whether or not the pedestals varied much with
time -- be believe it was better than in previous runs however. This is
something that needs study.
The mip peaks can obviously only come from runs with the beam on.
These are most important in the analysis of data from strips.
In general, all the gains (i.e. channels per mip) in a given AMU/ADC
chip (32 adjacent channels) are very similar. We may choose to get
the final parameters of these mip peaks from the non-zero suppressed
channels in the runs (every 16th channel) and assume they can be applied for
all channels in the chip.
This
web page contains a collection of links related to calibrations.
Pedestals from calibration runs?
Pedestals from later runs?
better mip peaks
updated August 15, 2003
John P. Sullivan
sullivan@lanl.gov